Main Menu

Recent posts

#71
General Discussion / Re: Is anyone still making the...
Last post by Thatslow_24v - February 28, 2023, 06:49:04 AM
I'm under the impression that another batch of the standalones will be ready in the next month-ish
#72
General Discussion / Re: Looking for information!
Last post by Thatslow_24v - February 26, 2023, 10:49:34 AM
Do the 67/67s perform pretty well on the low/midrange? I'm fueling for 550-600 hp and just want to have the most tourque and throttle response possible.

If the 67/67 can spool fairly close to the stock 351ve then I like that idea much more. Less money in turbos :D
#73
General Discussion / Is anyone still making the sta...
Last post by Lowslowfummins - February 26, 2023, 09:35:38 AM
I have been trying to figure out a option for he351ve set up on my 12v ford truck and I don't know enough about computers to build one so I came here but idk if anyone is even still making them the full stand alone that is if anyone has input please let me know I know the original was out to market like 10+ years ago
#74
General Discussion / Re: Looking for information!
Last post by hakcenter - February 25, 2023, 07:13:16 PM
Definitely would want to tune it a bit different depending on the setup.

In compounds the housing is going to get overran so you'll still need a wastegate which will complicate how to get the most from the charger.

Most of the tuning is the steepness of the end result. You want it to get to the top end as fast as possible but not overshoot as to have to open up just to eventually start closing again.

It's a very compounding problem, no pun intended.

For the compound probably would want the 351 to just go full open by 110k because the second charger is just going to overrun anyways and you'll want something stable to tune your wastegate against.

For a big single it's lot easier. Things can get real iffy if you throw mountains off fuel at it. Just need to really tune the top end steepness depending on the response you want.
#75
General Discussion / Re: Looking for information!
Last post by Thatslow_24v - February 23, 2023, 12:15:26 PM
Ok so I kind of have two ideas,

Like I said, either a modified charger with bigger wheels (67/67),

Or using the 351ve in its stock form and using an s475 as a primary atmospheric charger. My thinking is that this could be an amazing setup, providing lots and lots of tire shredding torque down low and using that 25cm capability of the 351 to push lots and lots of top end as well.

I would assume you would need to tune it differently in a compound application to truly take advantage of the maps of both compressors?

What are your thoughts? I am really looking for the super fast spool and almost violent midrange power that the ve can produce.
#76
General Discussion / Re: Looking for information!
Last post by hakcenter - February 22, 2023, 09:26:40 PM
I have a batch of standalones currently under way. Probably be ready early March.

Most of the major lifting can be done within the application. If you find controlling the top end to difficult there's some simple modification that can be done within the common code which shouldn't be too difficult to understand.

Generally though it's easier to review what's going on through a laptop connected to the device.

I'm not sure I've seen anyone with a compound setup. Where is the vgt going to be set ? I'd be willing to setup a remote session and get it tuned up a bit once you are all setup.
#77
General Discussion / Looking for information!
Last post by Thatslow_24v - February 22, 2023, 06:55:40 PM
I have been interested in running an he351ve for years and haven't been able to come across a controller.

It seems this is the best and most affordable option right now, so I have a few questions:

1) is the standalone controller still available and supported?

2) I have pretty heavy fuel modifications made to my truck, so I am planning on running a with bigger wheels(63/67 or similar), how much tuning is necessary to get great performance out of the bigger chargers? Can it be done in the app, or will I have to code?

3) has anyone used this controller in a compound application? If so, how well does it work?

Thank you!
#78
General Discussion / Re: Using moparman controller
Last post by hakcenter - February 20, 2023, 09:08:28 AM
Couldn't tell you without reviewing the code.

Ideally you want the vanes closed just enough but not hampering performance in the low range.

I started to integrate the crank shaft sensor and did a bit of 3d mapping against shaft speed and engine rpm to really dial in the bottom end response. IMHO it worked really well but the search for more power is always ever reaching.
#79
General Discussion / Re: Using moparman controller
Last post by Mystykal - February 20, 2023, 05:18:36 AM
I ended up going back to the cast 60mm wheel,bit better at low rpm but still feels like jt could have more punch down low.
#80
General Discussion / Re: Using moparman controller
Last post by hakcenter - February 16, 2023, 08:59:04 PM
Sorry I'm not much help with whatever moparman is doing.

If that's a bigger comp wheel and a smaller exducer it is going to be laggier.